Similarities Of Democracy And Absolutism - 838 Words

During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe many forms of government were created. Two efficient systems of government, Democracy and absolutism, were common during this time period; all around Europe. Democracy is a system of government that the people or citizens take part of government affairs by voting. The other system of government that was more efficient at its time was absolutism. Absolutism is a system of government that only one ruler controls the government and rule over peoples lives. Conversy had struck and many questions were asked; which system of government was more efficient - Democracy or Absolutism? The more efficient one is Absolutism, it assisted Louis XIV to run his government and helped many other†¦show more content†¦Ideas expressed by King James I of England in 1609, written in the document cited on the second sentence. â€Å" Kings are justly called gods, for that they exercise a . . . divine power upon earth. . . . God hath power to create or destroy, make or unmake at His pleasure†. The idea James had in the document is that Kings should be able to control everything and everyone. He believed that he was chosen by God and it was the only way to keep order in his kingdom. James also had the power to destroy; such things he can destroy is corruption in the government and also destroy anything thats inefficient to the kingdom. The divine rights stated that the King was basically God, so if you were Catholic at the time; you would believe it. If you didnt believe it, they did not argue against James power because they would be scared to claim he isnt God since something terrible would have happened to them questioning the king.. Document 3 also expresses the idea of a well knowledgeable king named King Louis XIV of France. In 1660 he quoted â€Å" The head alone has the right to deliberate and decide, and the function of all the other members consist only in carrying out the commands given to them† This quote can be found on document 3 in the first sentence. However, during the 17th and 18th century many people were not educated or intelligent, the people needed a ruler to tell them what to do otherwise they would be lost. Louis was there to guide themShow MoreRelatedSimilarities Between Absolutism And Democracy1729 Words   |  7 Pagescentralized, attempts were made to limit royal power and protected the rights of the governed. There has always been a battle of which political system worked better. Studies have shown that both absolutism and democracy have their advantages and disadvantages. There are various differences and similarities between the development of the nation-state ruled by an abs olute monarch like in France and in a democratic government like in England. Thomas Hobbes was one of the first English philosophersRead MorePà ©rola Barroca the Imperfect Art : Baroque Essay813 Words   |  4 PagesRepublic and democracy society was raised. Most people think that Baroque Art was form of Absolutism under the autocracy system. However, Baroque Arts were not come from Absolutism. This essay will deal with some countries where Baroque Art was started and their characteristics. Also, some comparison on contemporary art trend will be covered Generally, Baroque and Rococo are compared together. As Baroque was become trendy, another art trend was made, Rococo. What are their similarities and differencesRead MoreLiberal Absolutism Vs Liberal Liberalism Essay1805 Words   |  8 PagesThe objective of this paper is to firstly, compare and contrast the Hobbesian notion of liberal absolutism with Lockean liberal constitutionalism and secondly, elucidate how these similarities and differences impact the American presidency. I will begin by explicating liberal absolutism and liberal constitutionalism and then proceed to articulate their points of similarity and difference. Next, I claim that these two liberalisms can blur the lines in understanding the role of the executive. LetRead MoreHobbes And Rousseau On The Social Contract Theory1625 Words   |  7 Pagessome extent, to be based on the disquisitions of Hobbes. Conversely, Locke and Rousseau have transformed the concept of Hobbes to align with their perspectives on societ y and human nature. Hobbes and Rousseau have significant similarities and differences in their similarities conceptions regarding the social contract theory. Hobbes argues that man naturally desires security and order. It is the quest for security and preservation, as well as the need to avoid pain and misery that made man to getRead MoreVenezuela s Power And Power1288 Words   |  6 Pagesgradually turning into a tyranny. What used to be one of the most economically prosperous countries in Latin America, has been corrupted by a sole man, who single-handedly managed to control Venezuela for 15 years and pull it away from the ideal of democracy.[1] While alive, Hugo Chà ¡vez arose like a populist false prophet, took advantage of an establishment-tired and politically divided Venezuela, and did everything possible to perpetuate his own power and pave the way for a monopolistic tyrannical regimeRead MoreA Critical Analysis Of Citizen Life In Platos The Republic1552 Words   |  7 PagesThis philosophical study will compare the two paradigmatic regimes of the aristocracy and tyranny and also provide a critical analysis of citizen life in P lato’s The Republic. The similarities between Socrates’ definition of the Philosopher King of the aristocracy and the tyrant are that a single ruler governs over the republic. In some ways, the empowerment of a single individual provides a catalyst for an aristocratic engagement of the nobleman to support this form of governance. In these seeminglyRead MoreCompare and Contrast the Historical Significance Between Ww1And Ww2939 Words   |  4 PagesHISTORY SBA Compare and Contrast the historical significance between the two world WARS. http://www.diffen.com/difference/World_War_I_vs_World_War_II Similarities Topical sentence: A) Both war led to heavy casualties. 1) WW1: Estimated to be 10 million dead, 21 million wounded, and 7.7 million missing or imprisoned. 2) WW2: More than 40 million men and women were serving in the armed forces by 1944 and civilian and military deaths exceeded 55 million. Topical sentence: B) same both createdRead MoreEssay about Magna Carta1198 Words   |  5 Pagescontext, the Senate makes and reviews laws and participates in the voting elections. With the description of the three functions of the Roman Senate, it can be concluded that the Senate controlled Rome and the Roman Republic during that time. Sharing similarities in limited government and separation of powers, the Magna Carta and Roman Senate System were two kinds of democratic representation. The Roman Senate ran the Roman Republic without a king and divided the powers among the different positions heldRead MoreJohn Locke vs Jean-Jacques Rousseau.1663 Words   |  7 Pagesindividual units, and the people have the right to overthrow the legislator; Rousseau believes that the people have the legislative power, society conforms as a general will, and the people have no right to revolt against the legislator. Despite the similarities between Locke and Rousseau, their theories of the state of nature already differ in terms of morality, property, and freedom. Locke believes that men are born with morality ingrained in them; Rousseau states that men are born with no morality,Read MoreImpact Of The Enlightenment On Modern Political Thought1841 Words   |  8 Pagescontinued to shape modern governments. While it is true that certain forms of democracy evolved in ancient Athens and Rome, modern governments differ significantly from these ancient societies. In some cases, the very words put forth by the philosophers were written directly into the constitutions of countries practicing these new ideas. Without the contributions of John Locke and other enlightenment philosophers, democracy and government as we know it today would not exist. The shape of modern government

The Growth Of Australia s Resource Industries - 2073 Words

Beyond the tremendous growth of Australia’s resource industries lies another story of great Asian potential. This is the story of a future Australian economy and society that is fully engaged with Asia. Already, companies from outside the resources sector that have begun their journey into Asia are writing the first chapters of that story. The choice to make the Asian Century an Australian century is ours to make. It is time to decide. Asia’s economic transformation is most evident in three areas. First Asian economies have sustained high investment in infrastructure, housing, Industry and human capital. Second, these economies are increasingly sophisticated and integrated across the region and with the rest of the world. And third,†¦show more content†¦Similarly, relationships are critical in highly competitive Asian markets. Australian firms expanding to Asia must place higher bar, relative to their domestic businesses, on prioritising market entry, building relationships and gaining advantage from intellectual property and expertise. And finally, Asian markets are diverse and dynamic, so Australian firms need agile, adaptive operating models. As Australian firms develop and deliver services and products to Asia, they drive incomes and living standards for Australians. Non-resource exports to Asia already generate A$65b of revenue while Australian has A$74b of direct and portfolio investment in Asia. Yet despite the rapid growth of Asia, Australia’s share of non-resource imports into the region has fallen over the past decade. If Australia could arrest this decline or even increase its non-resource share of Asian imports to peak levels of 2001 Australia could gain between A$10b and A$30b in annual export revenue by 2021. Over the next decade this could be worth between A$60b-A$125b in total value for the Australian economy. These estimates do not account for revenue from Australia’s direct and portfolio investment stock in Asia and further revenue from Australia’s direct and portfolio investment stock in Asia and further revenue likely to flow from the increased resilience and adaptability of Australia ’s institutions and firms

Ethical Management Of E

Ethical Management Of E-mail Privacy Essay As I am sitting at my work station in a crowded office building, I hear the wonderful sound of Youve got mail. In turn I open my E-mail mailbox and find a letter from a nearby employee. This letter contains the usual funny joke of the day and a short joke ridiculing the boss, as usual. Who was to know that my supervisor would eventually find this letter, which would lead to both the termination of my job and my fellow employee?Does this sound common? It may, because the issue of E-mail and privacy is very common and controversial in our advanced technological world. The determination of what is ethical or unethical is not simple or straightforward. Employers and employees may have seen the ethical and legal issues associated with E-mail privacy differently. E-mail has become indispensable in the modern-day workplave, with more and more employers realizing that E-mail communication systems can increase the efficiency of communications internally. Along with this increase in the use of E-mail come legal issues involving employee privacy and monitoring. The laws addressing an employers rights to monitor E-mail traffic and employees rights to E-mail privacy are still evolving (Lyford 28). After much research, I believe employers should have the right to check employee E-mail, because E-mail is a company resource and a property right.Organizations have an obligation to themselves, their employees, their business partners, customers and society at large to act in an ethically responsible manner regarding their E-mail policies. Companies have many justified reasons for searching employee files such as preventing personal use or abuse of company resources and the prevention or investigation of corporate espionage or theft. Being that companies pay for the service of E-mail it can also be considered as a company property right. Employees may not realize how easily their bosses and coworkers can access their E-mail. Many high-tech firms are even able to retrieve messages that the employee thinks they have permanently deleted. An article in the magazine, Business First, makes a good point, Dont put anything in E-mail that you would not want read over the loud speaker through out the company (Miller 2). Although many computers and company E-mail accounts have passwords, it does not mean that they are protected. System administrators can access almost anyones E-mail. According to a web page on the Internet, The only way to protect your E-mail would be to regard your E-mail as you would a postcard. People must realize that unlike other forms of communication, E-mail has little protection, such as telephone companies do (Learn the Net 1). This provides the employer with the ability to monitor someones E-mail without them even knowing. The topic of E-mail is so current that it even hit the meeting of the Long Island Direct Marketing Association (LIDMA) on October 22, 1998. At the meeting privacy issues concerning E-mail in the workplace were discussed. A local attorney, Martin Gringer, Esg., explained the need for employees to understand that their e-mail may not be private and they should look into company policy before sending something which may later come back to haunt them (Hoke III 43). The general view from business corporations is that they have a right to check their employees E-mails. Many businesses, such as American Airlines, Federal Express, Eastman Kodak and UPS, regard employee E-mail as corporate property. They retain the right to investigate employee E-mail as often as they feel necessary (Rainone and Spinior 35). Many of these organizations feel that E-mail monitoring is a necessity: They pay for the service and believe they own the property rights. Such rights would consist of the right to search employee computer files, voice mail, E-mail and other networking communications. An employer is also free to intercept E-mail messages if necessary to protect the companys right, property or ability to conduct business (Eberly 22). On the other hand, employees feel that searches and invasions of E-mails are an invasion of their own privacy. Because of the potential for negative consequences resulting from the organizations action, the practice of E-mail monitoring may be viewed as unethical (CNET 1). Employees often contend that E-mail is analogous to the U.S. mail and users are entitled to the same privacy expectations as persons transmitting written communications via the U.S. Postal Service (Meyerhoff 31). Whether it is legal or not, the truth is that many employers now routinely monitor E-mail their employees send and receive. Some E-mail systems copy all messages that pass through them and others create backup copies of new messages as they arrive. Workers who logically assumes their messages are gone for good when they delete them are very often wrong. Cases now working through the courts challenging employers rights to monitor E-mail messages contain some novel arguments (Repa 2). Moment In Life EssayWhen it comes to the Internet and E-mail, no state law protects the privacy of an individual while at work. The only area open to dispute is the case in which an employer stipulates it wont monitor and then does (Richard 75). All of these court cases show how concerned that employees should be today. Privacy is a major concern in the business industry and should remain that way, so employees must take the time now to protect themselves from future litigations by producing an E-mail policy. Estimates indicate that only about one-third of U.S. businesses with E-mail systems have policies. When drafting an E-mail policy a company should consider various factors. They should take into effect the management concerns the policy will address such as improper use of business resources or leakage of proprietary information. It should also address the nature of the work force involved and how that could factor into their acceptance (Van Doren 5). In the official draft of an E-mail policy, the boss should explicitly state that E-mail is a company right and should be used for business purposes only. It should also state that the company reserves the right to monitor and disclose employee E-mails, and that the E-mail system may in no way be used to send offensive or improperty messages, such as racial or sexual slurs. Such a policy would set help everyone in the workplace by setting guidelines for both the employer and the employee (Van Doren 5). In all, the United States work environment must seek to raise awareness of the ethical issue of E-mail privacy by explaining both the vulnerabilities to which E-mail is subject to and by defining the privacy expectations to both employers and employees. We also must take into account the primary concerns in E-mail privacy invasion, which includes; ethical behavior, the employers perspective on E-mail privacy and a strategy for ethic management, which integrates ethical behavior and legal compliance on the E-mail privacy policy. On the whole, employers own the company resource E-mail and should be allowed to monitor it. Too many employees abuse the privilege of having company E-mail and action, such as monitoring, must be taken in order to prevent such abuse from happening. List of Works CitedBarsook, Bruce and Terry Roemer. Workplace E-mail Raises Privacy Issues. American City County Sep. 1998: 10. Bjerklie, David. E-mail: The Boss is Watching. Technology Review Apr. 1993: 14-15. Brown, Eryn. The Myth of E-mail Privacy. Fortune 3 Feb. 1997: 66. Coelho, Robert. Employer vs. Employee Rights on Workplace E-mail. Business Journal Serving San Jose Silicon Valley 16.26 (1998): 30-32. CNET Special Reports. What do the courts say? Accessed on March 5, 1999. Http://www.cnet.com/Content/Features/Dlife/Privacy/ss05.html Eberly, Steven. To Reap the Benefits of Electronic Mailing, You Must Know the Law. Cincinnati Business Courier 2 Dec. 1996: 22. Evans, David and Jean Musker. E-mail and the Workplace: Sending the Message Legally. Boston Business Journal 7 Nov. 1997: 35. Hoke III, Henry Reed. LIDMA Meeting Review. Direct Marketing Dec. 1998: 43. Learn the Net: How Private is Your E-mail? Accessed on March 5, 1999. http://learnthenet.com/english/html/75email.htm. Lyford, Daniel E. Your Business and E-mail Privacy Accountability. Business NH Magazine Apr. 1997: 28. Meyerhoff, Lisa H. Litigation Could Lurk In a Murky E-mail Policy. Austin Business Journal 12 June 1998: 31. Miller, Steven. E-mails popularity poses workplace privacy problems. Business First October 6, 1997: 1-3. Rainone, Sebastian M.; Spinior, Janice C.; et al. Ethical Management of Employee E-mail Privacy. Information Strategy Spring 98, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p34, 7p. Repa, Barbara Kate. Computers and E-mail on the Job: Theyre Watching You. Accessed on March 5, 1999. Http://www.nolo.com/ChunkEMP/computers.html. Richard, Diane. E-mail Ethics: Bosses Can Pry if They Want To. Corporate Report-Minenesota Jan. 1999: 74-76. Van Doren, Jeffrey A. E-mail Monitoring Policies- A Must For Employers. Supervisory Management Feb. 1996: 5.

What Were They Like Essay Example Essay Example

What Were They Like Essay Example Paper What Were They Like Essay Introduction The Poem we have studied is ‘What Were They Like’ which was written in the 1960’s by Denise Levertov. Denise Levertov was a anti war protester, who protested about the loss of the Vietnamese culture and the cruelty of the Americans. The structure of the poem was written in questions then answers as she wanted us to think about the questions then look at the answers after. Denise Levertov emphasises about the disaster which was caused by the Americans which left the people of Vietnam devastated. In the first question Denise Levertov tries to tell us that the people of Vietnam lived a simple life â€Å"did the people of Vietnam use lantern or stones†. Denise levertov tries to tell us that the people of Vietnam had hardly any money let alone electricity. Vietnam was isolated from the advanced countries such as America, United Kingdom and much more. This brings sympathy from the readers towards the people of Vietnam, as thinks makes the reader feel very saddene d by what happened to all those happy villagers. In the answer 1; Denise levertov tells us that darkness came across the Vietnam â€Å"Sir, their light hearts turned to stone†. Denise Levertov uses the words â€Å"Lights hearts† to tell us that the Vietnamese people were kind, calm and peaceful people. Then Levertov uses the word â€Å"Stone† to emphasise the fact that their lives came to an unexpected end. What Were They Like Essay Body Paragraphs In the second question, Denise Levertov asks us if people of Vietnam worshipped nature. â€Å"Did they hold ceremonies to reverence the opening of the bud?† What Denise Levertov was trying to explain was that they loved nature and they never harmed it. In the answer 2, Denise Levertov tells us that they maybe did hold ceremonies â€Å"perhaps they gathered once to delight in blossom† Levertov uses the words â€Å"perhaps† and † once† which indicates that nobody really knew if they did worship nature as it was a long time ago. In the second point, Denise Levertov tells us that the village was surrounded by sadness when the children died â€Å"But after the children died there were no buds†. She uses the quote to explain that there were no more laughter or happiness in the atmosphere surrounding the village. Denise Levertov uses the word â€Å"buds† as a metaphor to refer to the starting of a human life. In the third question, Denise Lever tov asks us if the Vietnam were happy or not â€Å"quiet laughter†. She is asking us if they were happy enjoying their lives and if they were a close unit (close family). In the answer 3, Denise Levertov tells us that Vietnam had nothing to enjoy themselves with. â€Å"Sir Laughter is bitter to the burned mouth†. She uses alliteration to show the reader how people can’t bare the thought of being happy anymore. She uses sarcasm to make her point about people who have lost everything can no longer experience any happiness. During and after the war people were getting torn to pieces, just because they were right in the middle of the war. In the question 4, Levertov asks us if the Vietnamese people used bone and ivory â€Å"did they use bone and ivory†. Levertov uses the words bone and ivory because it links to nature. So she asks us if they worshipped nature and if they used parts of nature. In the answer, Levertov tells us that ornaments are used when peopl e are happy. â€Å"Ornaments is used for joy† â€Å"bones were charred† if they wasn’t any joy in the village then there wasn’t any point of wearing ornaments. Levertov uses the words â€Å"bones† and â€Å"charred† to tell us that bones were burnt and the Vietnam used materials like bones to build their ornaments. She uses vivid language so that the reader can picture the devastation which was caused by war. Her responses are very negative and are all associated with deathly themes. In the point in question 5, Levertov tries to make us think about the Vietnamese people. â€Å"It is not remembered. Remember†. The picture that Levertov is trying to paint for us is that nothing is left and that nobody knows how they lived there lives. She is trying to tell us that nobody really knew but they had lives. They were happy the way they lived. They were ordinary people living their lives. The 2nd point Levertov tells us that they were poor â €Å"most were peasants†. This shows that they never lived in an advanced country; they were poor who worked in fields to earn a living for their family. The 3rd point which was given to us was â€Å"maybe fathers told their sons old tales†. Levertov is telling us that fathers and sons had very good relationship as it relates back to the previous question as that they were a unit. The last point is that the people of Vietnam never knew that they were going to be in a middle of a war. â€Å"When bombs smashed those mirrors it was only time to scream†. Levertov plays with words as she uses â€Å"bombs smashed those mirrors†. She is telling us that the bombs tore the village apart. The beautiful scenery wasn’t beautiful anymore. The bombs had destroyed the lives of the Vietnam people. Levertov uses the words â€Å"it was only time to scream† in this line she tells us that war came unexpectedly. There was no sign of warning. But when the war came it left the people of Vietnam devastated. In question 6, Levertov tells us that speech resembled singing â€Å"speech and singing†. Levertov emphasises the fact that they were happy people, they were joyful. In the 1st point, Levertov tries to tell us that the villagers were calm people â€Å"singing resembled flight of moths on the moonlight†. Levertov tells us that they were quiet, who loved nature. In the 2nd point Levertov tells us that there isn’t an echo left in the village. â€Å"Who can say? It is silent now† this shows that the destruction brought the village at the edge of death. Many people’s lives became meaningless. Levertov uses the short sentence as it stands out from the rest. Also it is very clear in what the sentence means also it makes the reader think about Vietnam. The poem ‘What Were They Like’ is written in past and present tense. The questions are written in past tense and the answers are written in present ten se. She used the questions in past and present tense because she wanted us to think back. She wanted to tell us what they did back then. The answers are in past tense as nobody knows how they lived. The answers I think children were answering to a man of respect as nearly in each answer it starts off with ‘Sir’. By bringing in ‘Sir’ Levertov is mocking the situation, as children answer their teachers by ‘Sir’ and the villagers had to answer the soldiers by ‘Sir’. She is trying to emphasise the fact that the people of Vietnam had no respect and they needed respect. The tone of this poem is sad â€Å"who can say it is silent now†. This quote was used to reflect the death of the happy loving villagers. The first stanza is positive and the second stanza was negative, this helps us to understand the people a bit better. The themes of this poem are love, death war, children and poverty. They used the quote â€Å"maybe fathers tol d their sons old tales† for love to emphasise that they were ordinary human beings who had big hearts. â€Å"But after the children were killed where were no more buds†. This quote represents death and children due to the because they are telling us that when children died they won’t be there to grow up to get married and have children’s which lessons the population. â€Å"When bombs smashed those mirrors there was only time to scream†. They give the idea that the US threw bombs at the Vietnamese people. This is related to war. For poverty they used â€Å"rice and bamboo† to tell us that they never had any luxury things they were still working in fields. This poem is very effective in the way the poem is layed out from my point of view. The quote which I found very effective was â€Å"who can say it is silent now† as it is short and very effective sentence and it gives the idea that everyone is killed and that there is a deserted villa ge. London Fete is a protest poem which was written by Coventry Patmore in 1890 after public executions had stopped. Patmore objects to the fact that hanging was a public spectacle as it was used for an amusement for the big crowds which would gather round. Patmore describes the different people watching and there reactions â€Å"here a girl form her vesture tore a rag to wave with†. â€Å"There a man, with yelling tired†. Patmore uses the title ‘London fete’ on purpose as each word has its own meaning. London is the capital city of the United Kingdom and that’s where rules are made, also fete has two meanings, fete is when there are amusement parks for everyone to enjoy. Fate is destiny and the person who is getting hanged in the poem, his destiny is death. The structure of the poem that Patmore uses is one of short snappy lines which make the whole poem long and thin to mimic the hangman’s rope. Differences and similarities of WWTL and LOND ON FETE ‘WWTL’ and ‘London Fete’ have many similarities. Both poems are about death. â€Å"after the children were killed† (WWTL). â€Å"They brought the man out to be hang’d† (London Fete). Also both are protest poems written to influence public feelings about events that the authors feel to be wrong. In both poems, death is legal. As in WWTL, the American senate would have authorised American troops to bomb the Vietnam, whilst in LF, the hanging would have followed a legal trial. Structure of both poems are both similar, both have short lines which will give more effect to the words. Both poems are very visual because the poets use graphic language to shock the readers. â€Å"The dangling corpse hung straight and still† (LF). â€Å"All the bones were charred† (WWTL). There are many differences in the way ‘What Were They Like’ and ‘London Fete’ were written. One of the differences is that ‘ What Were They Like’ was about families working as a unit and helping each other out. This is one of the quotes I took to back my point â€Å"maybe fathers told their sons old tales†. On the other hand the people of ‘London Fete’ help there babies to have a good angle on seeing someone getting hanged and to show how entertaining death was â€Å"mothers hold their babies to see†. Levertov exploits the Vietnam culture to it’s full potential by telling us how kind, caring, loving and happy people were however Patmore tells us that people gathered just to see death then they travelled in there own separate ways. Patmore tries to show how vile these people were. This shows a big difference in the ‘London Fete’ and ‘What Were They Like’ culture. Levertov once again shows us that the people of Vietnam were happy. Levertov tells us that the people of Vietnam’s happiness lied in giving birth; they ‘gatheredâ€⠄¢ together to celebrate life but Patmore’s poem tells us that they had nothing to do other than watch a man die. â€Å"The dangling man hung straight and still†. Patmore uses this sentence to create tension in the reader as to, why would people be happy to watch someone die? Levertov exaggerates to put her point across the US showing them that Vietnam never did anything wrong. They were being killed for living a happy life. On the other hand Patmore’s poem shows how cruel the London society was. In ‘What Were They Like’ Levertov explains to us that the people of Vietnam were very isolated and we should have left it that way as so many innocent people have died. â€Å"There was only time to scream† Levertov tells us that death brought fear into the hearts of the villagers. In contrast to that, Patmore shows us that people were entertained by watching other people die. Everyone â€Å"enjoyed the wicked treat† (an oxymoron). This shows t hat they had no feelings for others. As on Levertov poet, it showed the people of Vietnam were scared to death watching people die We will write a custom essay sample on What Were They Like Essay Example specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on What Were They Like Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on What Were They Like Essay Example specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer

Memorandum to the Board of Directors

Common Spelling Mistakes Should You Use Lose or Loose

Common Spelling Mistakes Should You Use Lose or Loose Do you know the difference between the words â€Å"lose† and â€Å"loose†? Do you wonder each time you write one of these words whether you’re spelling it right? Today I will not only give you examples of how to know whether to use lose or loose, but I will also give you a trick to remember forever which spelling is correct. Lose is Always a Verb Some of the most common meanings for the word â€Å"lose† are to come to be without something, to fail to keep track of something, to have someone die, or to fail to win. Here is a list of some things you can lose: keys; money; a job; 25 pounds; loved ones; a game of pool, your virginity, or your mind. Before you get lost in thought about all the things you might lose, let’s move on to our next word. Loose is Usually an Adjective â€Å"Loose† can mean free, unfettered, unbound, or lacking in restraint; a few of its antonyms (opposites) are firm, bound and tight. It can also be used as a VERB meaning to let go of, let shoot or fly, or set free. Examples of Things that Can Be Loose Some things that can be or get loose are: Hair, knots, zoo animals, a sexually promiscuous person, a structure, an interpretation, vegetables in the grocery store, and teeth. There are many idioms that use the word â€Å"loose† such as â€Å"let loose,† â€Å"break loose,† â€Å"cut loose,† â€Å"hang loose,† â€Å"turn loose,† and â€Å"on the loose.† And are any of you â€Å"footloose and fancy free†? I hope the difference between â€Å"lose† and â€Å"loose† is clear. Now, how will you remember which is which? Knowing When to Use Lose or Loose It’s easy. Whenever you find yourself loosely throwing a double letter â€Å"o† into the word loose, ask yourself, â€Å"Should I *lose* the â€Å"o†?† Here are a few tricks to help you remember which word to use. Lose If you want a verb that means â€Å"to be without something,† then be without the extra â€Å"o†! If you want to say you â€Å"didnt win,† imagine the loser paying the winner the extra â€Å"o.† If you misplace something, misplace the second â€Å"o.† Loose If on the other hand, if you want your word to mean free, unbound, or anything loosely in that category, be free with your â€Å"o†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s! Dare I say, â€Å"Use them or lose them?† If you have questions about this or any other spelling/grammatical issue, ask The Essay Expert. You can also sign up for Brendas Grammar Writing Tips List for tips on how to communicate more professionally.

In finance, risk is best judged in a portfolio context. Is this true Essay - 7

In finance, risk is best judged in a portfolio context. Is this true Why - Essay Example This paper takes an argument to prove that individual stock cannot allow investors to help judging the overall risk associated with investment on shares. A critical criticism context will also be introduced in the paper later on to justify the argument regarding risk being judged better in a portfolio of stocks. It will not be incorrect to state that investors of stock market are directly associated with the risk which is not avoidable. These risks can be variable in types such as short-term risk or portfolio risk. For the focus of this paper, portfolio risk is being discussed in a contextual manner. It should be noted that portfolio risk is relatively low in accordance to the movements within the stock market. Herein, the process or concept of aggregation is considered for calculating risk associated with an asset or for valuing a company. It is due to this reason that individual investors are suggested to manage their portfolio risk because their individual transactions are aggregated. This denotes that investors tend to diversify their assets in order to judge the risk of security (Brealey, et al., 2010). It is not being proven here that by taking an aggregate of the risk of in a portfolio can eliminate risk. Portfolio of stock allows the investors to understand the associated risk in accordance of variation in all levels of the market. There is an underlying condition associated with portfolio risk. As a matter of fact, risk can be best judged in a portfolio context, as diversified stocks can have reduced risk. The underlying condition is that the return which is received by the investors is less than one. In this case, it is stated that diversification will remain beneficial or the investors (Brealey, et al., 2010). Risk or systematic risk is interlinked with the changes that may occur in the market. The risk is